DISCUSSION
After a long time
picking up an email that lay unanswered in the
webforum, a point has been made on the concept of
globalization. Anyone wishing to respond to the
links and/or these letters may send an e-mail from
the
feedback-page.
11/4/02
Eve
wrote:
Hi,
maybe this is a stupid question but i have
to do something for school. it's about
globalising (i think it's spelled right
this way....) i need to communicate with
someone from another country who can tell
me more about this subject in his/her
country and what he's thinking about it.
Can someone please help me??? Thanks! You
can write an email to
evaatje26@hotmail.com or add me at
msnmessenger
|
05/28/03
The
webmaster of the Order of Time
writes:
There
is a lot to do about globalization,
especially in politics: it is the more or
less sincere effort to make one big
worldcommunity of happy people. The point
is that it is proposed without much
respect for the classical doctrines of
uniting. Uniting in matter easily corrupts
into this or that ego-circus. One makes
economic agreements that benefit only a
few. One makes for cultures that do not
really care to integrate with the rest. So
how can one become a wordcommunity then?
It only ends in repression, exploit and
war that way and that is the argument of
the anti-globalists: they say it is a
conspiration of the international capital
interests. I have to say that capital goes
with a good policy, so that is not our
point. The point that we make at
theorderoftime is that the oneness can be
a thing of consciousness only, each
material version of it is a form of
falsehood. On the condition that the
politicians accept the discipline of that
unification will we subscribe to the
globalization concept.
|